The same justice framework can bridge human and nonhuman realms
Evidence
My argument is that in both environmental and ecological justice, we can use a similar set of concepts, tools, and languages; indeed, the same conceptions can be applied to both environmental and ecological matters. Realizing this may help us get beyond the divide between environmental and ecological justice, and into a practice of recognition, expanding decision-making, and providing the capacities necessary for individual and community functioning to human and nonhuman alike. — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 13
Categorization
- QUESTION: Extending recognition and participation to nonhumans raises hard questions about who or what can be a participant or functioning subject worth investigating further.
- XREF: connects to: A shared justice vocabulary can unify environmental and ecological justice movements — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 41; One integrated justice discourse can serve both human and ecological struggles — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice:…, 552; Dene land relations frame reciprocal obligations between humans and nonhumans. — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 243 (+5 more)
Broader Connections
- One integrated justice discourse can serve both human and ecological struggles
#corroborates(0.95) — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 552 - Ecological justice extends all four justice components to nonhuman nature
#expands(0.90) — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 549 - Dene land relations frame reciprocal obligations between humans and nonhumans.
#exemplifies(0.88) — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 243 - Justice comprises interlinked distribution, recognition, participation, and capability
#expands(0.82) — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 53 - Justice to nature can rest on shared qualities without erasing difference
#qualifies(0.80) — David Schlosberg, Defining Environmental Justice, 449