The objective-enemy category permanently renews terror as targets shift across categories

Evidence

The chief difference between the despotic and the totalitarian secret police lies in the difference between the “suspect” and the “objective enemy.” The latter is defined by the policy of the government and not by his own desire to overthrow it. He is never an individual whose dangerous thoughts must be provoked or whose past justifies suspicion, but a “carrier of tendencies” like the carrier of a disease. Practically speaking, the totalitarian ruler proceeds like a man who persistently insults another man until everybody knows that the latter is his enemy, so that he can, with some plausibility, go and kill him in self-defense. This certainly is a little crude, but it works—as everybody will know who ever watched how certain successful careerists eliminate competitors. — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 950 (#expands, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Terror’s content is hunting objective enemies once real ones are exterminated; Totalitarian rule shifts from persecuting an objective enemy to randomly selected undesirables; Islamophobic tropes become real violence through perceived enemy images (+8 more)

Broader Connections