The New Left crystallized in 1967-68 after divergent national origins

Evidence

‘New Left’ means a great many different things in different contexts, but as a distinct political tendency within the plethora of diverse radicalisms which arose in this period, the term has to have, I believe, some claim to an affiliation with Marxism, however the affiliation or the Marxism may be conceived. In Britain, surely, the roots go back to at least the consequences of 1956 (Suez, Hungary, the Khrushchev Report). In the USA, the Cuban Revolution was perhaps more decisive, even though Monthly Review had started even earlier to define an alternative kind of Marxism, different from the Stalinist one. It is possible to argue, in any case, that while the origins of the ‘New Left’ may be traced back even to the ‘Old Left’ of the 1930s, it was in 1967-68 that it first made major interventions in most Western societies, especially the universities. — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory, 662

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The claim that different historical catalysts (1956 for Britain, Cuba for the US) produced the same formation invites deeper comparative inquiry into how national path-dependent each ‘New Left’ actually was.
  • XREF: connects to: Postwar New Leftists rediscovered the Frankfurt School through pirated and reissued pre-1950 writings — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History
, 76