The moratorium phase frees extremists to pursue identity questions without the group’s framework

Evidence

The moratorium also grants the participant a certain amount of flexibility and freedom to pursue identity questions which invariably arise in the absence of the social and ideological framework provided by the far-right organization during the participant’s active affiliation. — Amy Fisher-Smith, Charles R. Sullivan, John D. Macready, and Geoffrey Manzi, Identity Reconfiguration and the Core…, 430

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines ‘moratorium’ as the analytical concept for the phase of identity questioning that follows loss of the ideological framework.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Amy Fisher-Smith, Charles R. Sullivan, John D. Macready, and Geoffrey Manzi, Identity Reconfiguration and the Core…, 430
  • XREF: connects to: Personal identity crisis can open individuals to extremist groups offering identity answers — Lea Echelmeyer, Anne-Marie Slotboom, and Frank Weerman, The Putative Effect of Identity on…, 20; De-radicalization is theorized as identity reconfiguration away from the extremist group — Lea Echelmeyer, Anne-Marie Slotboom, and Frank Weerman, The Putative Effect of Identity on…, 20; Consensus-based protest groups deliberately suppress individual prominence to preserve collective identity. — Vincent Bevins, If We Burn: The Mass Protest Decade and…, 358

Broader Connections