The line between forced and free attention is itself a political question needing investigation
Evidence
Perhaps the negotiation of what is a coercive, externally imposed attentional technology and an intentional liberating technique—the “fluctuating tension between attentional activity and differing forms of attentional pull” (Throop & Duranti 2015, p. 1056)—is what truly needs to be investigated. There is certainly the danger of overlooking the societal structures and cultural discourses surrounding often class-specific and racialized attentional ideologies and practices. — Annual Review of Anthropology contributors (⚠ verify author line), The Political Economy of Attention, 67
Categorization
- DEFINE: Distinguishes ‘attentional technologies’ (external, coercive) from ‘attentional techniques’ (internal, liberating) as an analytical distinction worth interrogating.
- SEED: Article angle: the politics of who gets to call what ‘distraction’ versus ‘focus’ — attentional ideologies as class-coded and racialized.
- XREF: connects to: Attention has emerged as a site of political, economic, and moral struggle — Annual Review of Anthropology contributors (⚠ verify author line), The Political Economy of Attention, 10; Attention is the defining political and existential question of the current era; Deciding that something is unpolitical is itself a political act. — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab: A History of the…, 1088
Related
- Attention has emerged as a site of political, economic, and moral struggle (similarity 0.86)
- Anthropology has studied attention mostly implicitly, not as an explicit topic (similarity 0.82)
- Attention is the defining political and existential question of the current era (similarity 0.81)
- Attention can be anthropologically theorized as either technologies or techniques (similarity 0.81)
- Debates about attention are ultimately ontological, not political (similarity 0.81)
- Attention functions as a political economy embedded in specific temporal contexts (similarity 0.80)
- Attention is an activity that forms persons, not a resource that platforms act upon (similarity 0.79)
- Anthropologists themselves operate within political economies of attention. (similarity 0.79)
- Politics itself is being reshaped by attentional extraction industries (similarity 0.79)
- Attention is a socially produced and politically governed resource, not merely a scarce one. (similarity 0.78)
- Attention’s slipperiness itself makes it a subject for ethnographic study. (similarity 0.78)
Broader Connections
- Attention is the defining political and existential question of the current era
#expands(0.85) - Deciding that something is unpolitical is itself a political act.
#expands(0.80) — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab, 1088