The line between forced and free attention is itself a political question needing investigation

Evidence

Perhaps the negotiation of what is a coercive, externally imposed attentional technology and an intentional liberating technique—the “fluctuating tension between attentional activity and differing forms of attentional pull” (Throop & Duranti 2015, p. 1056)—is what truly needs to be investigated. There is certainly the danger of overlooking the societal structures and cultural discourses surrounding often class-specific and racialized attentional ideologies and practices. — Annual Review of Anthropology contributors (⚠ verify author line), The Political Economy of Attention, 67

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Distinguishes ‘attentional technologies’ (external, coercive) from ‘attentional techniques’ (internal, liberating) as an analytical distinction worth interrogating.
  • SEED: Article angle: the politics of who gets to call what ‘distraction’ versus ‘focus’ — attentional ideologies as class-coded and racialized.
  • XREF: connects to: Attention has emerged as a site of political, economic, and moral struggle — Annual Review of Anthropology contributors (⚠ verify author line), The Political Economy of Attention, 10; Attention is the defining political and existential question of the current era; Deciding that something is unpolitical is itself a political act. — Gil Anidjar, The Jew, the Arab: A History of the…, 1088

Broader Connections