The liberties-versus-security binary justifies sacrificing out-group rights

Evidence

The either/or of civil liberties versus national security is a dangerous one. It produces an ideology that it is OK to sacrifice the rights of some people over others. This way of thinking has led to some of the worst human rights abuses in history, including the internment of Japanese Americans. — Saher Selod, Forever Suspect_ Racialized…, 487

Categorization

• XREF: Directly parallels the internment logic (pg 140, Korematsu) and the balancing-liberty narrative critiqued across surveillance-race scholarship. — connects to: Securing negative rights globally required proactive enforcement, not passivity — Quinn Slobodian, Globalists: The End of Empire and the…, 415; Users are more vulnerable to algorithms they know are mindless. — Yanis Varoufakis, Technofeudalism: What Killed Capitalism, 314; Security-seeking purification inevitably intensifies the very insecurity it targets — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 1835 (+1 more)