The Italian Communist leadership gravely underestimated fascism’s significance for years

Evidence

It would be unjust to claim that the P.C.I. leadership was responsible for the fascist secure of power—as both Tasca and Radek were at different times to suggest—but it certainly gravely underestimated its significance, and continued to do so until ig26. Even Gramsci did not prior to his arrest arrive at a consistent and adequate appreciation of the specificity of the new type of regime, and as for Bordiga, his declaration in 1924 that “the bourgois counter-revolution for us is the proof of the inevitability of the revolution” eloquently sums up his determined rejection of the idea that the fascist seizure of power was anything to worry about at all. — Antonio Gramsci, Selections from the Prison Notebooks, 134

Categorization

Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims

  • XREF: Bordiga’s refusal to recognize fascism as a new regime type connects to Gramsci’s later concept of the state and the distinction between domination and hegemony, and to theories of misrecognition in critical theory.

Broader Connections