The far right adopted anti-Muslim rhetoric as a strategic path to electoral power

Evidence

Without any doubt whatsoever, the growing success of the BnP has been achieved via its clear and acknowledged shift towards a more explicit anti-Muslim, anti-Islam agenda that both taps into and feeds the fear of threat. As the Party’s leader, Nick Griffin told a group of activists in Burnley in March 2006: We bang on about Islam. Why? Because to the ordinary public out there it’s the thing they can understand. It’s the thing the newspaper editors sell newspapers with. If we were to attack some other ethnic group – some people say we should attack the Jews … But … we’ve got to get to power. And if that was an issue we chose to bang on about when the press don’t talk about it … the public would just think we were barking mad … … It wouldn’t get us anywhere other than stepping backwards. It would lock us in a little box; the public would think ‘extremist crank lunatics, nothing to do with me’. And we wouldn’t get power. — Chris Allen, Islamophobia, 471

Categorization

  • QUESTION: Griffin’s own words show anti-Muslim rhetoric as a calculated electoral instrument rather than genuine belief — worth chasing how this complicates the ‘Islamophobia as ideology’ framing.
  • XREF: connects to: Hypernationalist rhetoric served to justify a supranational monopoly of power; Targeted minorities resist far-right divide-and-conquer tactics by refusing to disclaim Muslim identity. — A. Hussain, N. Meer, Framing Muslim Integration, 550; Far-right groups strategically recruit Sikhs by differentiating them from Muslims. — Runnymede Trust (ed. Farah Elahi & Omar Khan), Islamophobia: Still a Challenge for Us…, 545 (+6 more)

Broader Connections