The exiled Institute returned to Frankfurt as an established, diversified academic team.

Evidence

When they returned to Frankfurt, it was as the authors of Dialectic of Enlightenment and of Studies in Prejudice, as philosophers of history and critics of culture, as social psychologists and experts in modern sociological research technique: as established academics who seemed willing to pass on their achievements, and as a team. Only Adorno, however, had any serious intention not to rest on his laurels. — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School, 454

Categorization

• XREF: Names the two canonical works (Dialectic of Enlightenment, Studies in Prejudice) that anchor the Frankfurt School’s postwar reputation and recur throughout the book’s later chapters. — connects to: The Institute’s return to Frankfurt transformed it from isolated enclave to mainstream intellectual force. — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 872; Frankfurt city government financed and relocated the institute’s rebuilding — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1862; American occupation officials helped lure the Frankfurt School back to Germany — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 847 (+2 more)
• yield-rescued: below the book’s yield-target cutoff, included anyway for connecting to: The Institute’s return to Frankfurt transformed it from isolated enclave to mainstream intellectual force. — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 872; Frankfurt city government financed and relocated the institute’s rebuilding — Rolf Wiggershaus, The Frankfurt School: Its History,…, 1862; American occupation officials helped lure the Frankfurt School back to Germany — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination: A History…, 847 (+2 more)

Broader Connections

• The Frankfurt School’s estrangement persisted even after its physical return to Germany. #complicates (0.74) — Martin Jay, The Dialectical Imagination, 890