The digital economy functions as legitimating hegemonic ideology for capitalism

Evidence

As a preliminary definition, we can say that the digital economy refers to those businesses that increasingly rely upon information technology, data, and the internet for their business models. This is an area that cuts across traditional sectors – including manufacturing, services, transportation, mining, and telecommunications – and is in fact becoming essential to much of the economy today. Understood in this way, the digital economy is far more important than a simple sectoral analysis might suggest. In the first place, it appears to be the most dynamic sector of the contemporary economy – an area from which constant innovation is purportedly emerging and that seems to be guiding economic growth forward. The digital economy appears to be a leading light in an otherwise rather stagnant economic context. Secondly, digital technology is becoming systematically important, much in the same way as finance. As the digital economy is an increasingly pervasive infrastructure for the contemporary economy, its collapse would be economically devastating. Lastly, because of its dynamism, the digital economy is presented as an ideal that can legitimate contemporary capitalism more broadly. The digital economy is becoming a hegemonic model: cities are to become smart, businesses must be disruptive, workers are to become flexible, and governments must be lean and intelligent. In this environment those who work hard can take advantage of the changes and win out. Or so we are told. — Nick Srnicek, Platform Capitalism, 16

Categorization

• DEFINE: Defines the digital economy as a cross-sector infrastructure with systemic importance akin to finance — a definitional building block for the whole platform argument.
• XREF: The hegemonic-ideal and ‘smart city/disruptive business/flexible worker’ litany connects to Zuboff’s point about how surveillance capitalism frames itself as the only viable future. — connects to: Web 2.0 ideology fuses Silicon Valley capitalism with countercultural activism while embracing capitalism — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 55; Web 2.0 openness ideology serves corporate profit over individual benefit — Alice E. Marwick, Status Update: Celebrity, Publicity,…, 640; Edu-tech firms frame pre-digital schooling as a deficient factory model — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 532 (+12 more)

Related

• Edu-tech firms frame pre-digital schooling as a deficient factory model (similarity 0.79)
• Dataism disavows ideology yet constitutes a new ideology of digital totalitarianism (similarity 0.79)

Broader Connections

• Technological progress legitimates capitalism as the best possible system #corroborates (0.82) — Clara E. Mattei, Escape from Capitalism, 122
• Internet self-representation conceals a capitalist infrastructure producing the self as commodity #exemplifies (0.80)
• Theorizing away the concept of totality serves capitalism by hiding it from political challenge #expands (0.78) — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 713
• Capitalism governs through a technological rationality so pervasive that it no longer needs ideology #qualifies (0.75) — Wendy Brown, Undoing the Demos, 228