The contrast between Quranic literalism and Biblical critical reading is overstated

Evidence

I wish to argue that this distinction is sometimes overstated and can be misleading. As Asad observes, Islamophobic discourse insists that the Quran forces a literalist interpretation—and therefore a prescribed set of actions—on its adherents, whereas the Bible allows for and has thus been repeatedly subject to critical interpretation. — Peter Morey, Islamophobia and the Novel, 493

Categorization

Category: Contrarian or Surprising Claims

  • XREF: This undercuts a common Islamophobic premise the reader may encounter in their own sources; useful counter-argument.
  • SEED: Angle: the secularization thesis as a disguised Protestant theology—how literary criticism’s ‘neutral’ tools carry a religious genealogy.

Broader Connections