The Colloque Lippmann’s purpose was agenda-setting, not settled doctrine.
Evidence
Discussions at the “Colloque Lippmann” remained vague and broad because of both the relative brevity of the individual contributions and a general sense of uncertainty about whether the conversation should focus on a reexamination of foundational principles or a discussion of practical policies. … The primary task of the meeting, however, was to establish an agenda for the future of the movement itself, and about that the participants remained in broad agreement. — Angus Burgin, The Great Persuasion, 192
Categorization
- DEFINE: Clarifies that the Colloque was an institution-building moment with an unresolved identity (theory vs. policy), which shaped the later MPS.
- XREF: connects to: The Colloque Lippmann endorsed a revised liberalism without specifying its content. — Angus Burgin, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free…, 187; Within the Colloque Lippmann, uncritical liberal purists were a marginalized minority. — Angus Burgin, The Great Persuasion: Reinventing Free…, 191; The Colloque Lippmann was an exclusionary gathering that seeded Europe’s postwar liberal establishment — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin: The Making…, 277
Broader Connections
- The Colloque Lippmann was an exclusionary gathering that seeded Europe’s postwar liberal establishment
#expands(0.85) — Philip Mirowski & Dieter Plehwe (eds.), The Road from Mont Pèlerin, 277