The Black-Scholes model gained market traction slowly, not through instant self-fulfilling prophecy.

Evidence

If that use had been as rapid and widespread as later accounts (e.g., Passell 1997) have suggested, it would raise the possibility that the model’s success was a simple self-fulfilling prophecy. Matters were, however, slower, more complex, and more interesting than that. It was not immediately clear to all participants that one needed an option pricing model. Initially, the CBOE traded only call options and did so in a bear market, in which calls with high strike prices seemed always to expire unexercised, because the stock price remained below the strike price. A good income could therefore be earned by selling those calls without bothering with theory or hedging. “Sell the 280s and drive a Mercedes,” became the motto of at least some traders, referring to highstrike-price ($280) calls on IBM, then the stock on which options were most heavily traded (Doherty interview). Sophisticated models might not seem necessary even for options for which the probability of exercise was higher. Participants could, for example, turn to rule-of-thumb pricing heuristics like those used in the ad hoc options market. … One manager, Michael Greenbaum, tried to teach pricing theory to market makers: “He’d stay late to give seminars and two people would show up, and it would be Joe Doherty [Sullivan’s deputy, who became a CBOE trader] and somebody else, and they were already fully sold disciples… . He’s trying to bring in some new technology [option pricing theory] and nobody would use it or pay for it” (Carusillo and Struve interview 1). — Donald MacKenzie & Yuval Millo, Constructing a Market, Performing Theory, 111

Categorization

  • SEED: Angle: the performativity of financial theory is a slow, contested, infrastructure-building process rather than a self-fulfilling prophecy — a counter-narrative to the sudden-triumph story told in retrospect.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s own research on performativity of finance theory — McKenzie’s work and the ‘an engine, not a camera’ thesis, and how real adoption lagged. — connects to: Option market prices initially diverged from the Black-Scholes model but converged — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 735; Black-Scholes-Merton theory shaped exchange fortunes before markets changed to match it. — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 629; Market pricing regimes shift with historical events, not gradual efficiency gains — Donald MacKenzie, An Engine, Not a Camera: How Financial…, 151 (+1 more)
  • ADDENDUM: Complements the argument in ‘On Sacrifice’ and the infrastructure theme: theory here operates as a contested technology nobody initially wanted — a useful counterpoint to clean narratives of diffusion.

Broader Connections