The 1964-67 second republic pitted democratic nationalists against self-interested sectarian entrepreneurs
Related
- Second republic politics split between democratic nationalists and self-interested sectarian entrepreneurs (similarity 0.83)
- Somali politics 1964-67 split democratic nationalists from self-interested sectarian entrepreneurs. (similarity 0.83)
- Democracy can function on recognition by only a minority (similarity 0.82)
- Declining ex-imperial societies scapegoat minorities to explain their problems (similarity 0.81)
- Church-state conflict after 1861 pushed the church toward local mafia alliances (similarity 0.81)
- Communist parties lost Dalit support by treating caste as secondary to class (similarity 0.80)
- Socialism became the banner of petit-bourgeois members appalled by capitalism (similarity 0.80)
- European plutocrats tried to reconcile anachronistic demographics with ultra-modern production. (similarity 0.80)
- Revolutionary regimes attract blind faith, not grounded trust (similarity 0.79)
- State weakness cannot explain the mafia’s emergence (similarity 0.79)
- The United States declined to back Egal against Osman in 1966 (similarity 0.79)
- Nonviolent mass action handed liberation to the petit bourgeoisie (similarity 0.79)
- Most Somalis presumed sitting Prime Minister Sharmarkee would be renominated after the 1964 election (similarity 0.79)
- Juridico-political ideology masks the economic’s determinant role under capitalism (similarity 0.79)
- Dependent elites believed they had to westernize or perish. (similarity 0.78)