Terrorists are rarely psychopathological, and labeling them so evades political questions

Evidence

Nor does terrorism in general appear to be a result of mental pathologies. Rasch (1979, p. 80), a psychiatrist who has analyzed several members of the West German terrorist organizations, warns that “no conclusive evidence has been found for the assumption that a significant number of them are disturbed or abnormal.” In Rasch’s (1979, p. 79) view, the argument that terrorism is pathological behavior is an attempt to avoid discussion of the political and social issues raised by terrorism. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4088

Categorization

  • XREF: Parallels the Frankfurt School finding that the ‘manipulative type’ used bureaucratic process, not personal hatred — both debunking individual-pathology accounts of collective political violence. — connects to: Terrorism is not generally a product of mental pathology — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4088; Terrorism stems from small-group dynamics rather than abnormal personalities — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4179; The mental-disorder theory of terrorism lacks reliable clinical evidence — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4089 (+7 more)

Broader Connections