Taste judgments measure personal skill, not just classify social position

Evidence

Judgments on taste don’t just classify but gauge personal virtues and talents. When someone can’t distinguish between an expensive, high-grade, artisanally made guitar and a cheap, mass-produced model, the scholar David Berger writes, “We don’t say that they have ‘different tastes’ in musical instruments. We say that they are ‘poor judges’ of musical instruments.” The skill aspect of taste means it never just expresses our unconscious habitus, but can be shaped through conscious choices. Good taste can be a reflection of noble birth—or the result of self-improvement. — W. David Marx, Status and Culture, 250

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sharpens the distinction between taste-as-classifier and taste-as-skill, introducing the ‘poor judges’ framing that recurs through the chapter.
  • XREF: connects to: Taste is a social mechanism relative to era and society, not an innate universal — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for
, 244; Taste manifests only through social activity filtered by status value — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for
, 245; Achieving high-status taste requires deep knowledge, congruence, and bounded originality — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for
, 251 (+4 more)

Broader Connections