Elite taste favors forms requiring cultivated knowledge to enjoy

Evidence

For Kant, understanding the beautiful meant transcending immediate sensual pleasures and relishing refined forms of “contemplative” aesthetics. The “Kantian aesthetic,” as anthropologist Daniel Miller writes, is “one of refusal, a foregoing of the immediate pleasure of the sensual and the evident in favour of a cultivated and abstracted appropriation through an achieved understanding.” There is also an anti-Kantian aesthetic, which we could label “immediate”: no special knowledge of conventions is required to enjoy the thrills of roller coasters, catchy Top 40 songs, and ice cream sundaes. Kantian taste requires us to find pleasure in things that take time and effort to appreciate: classical music, avant-garde art, postmodern novels, and gourmet cuisine. — W. David Marx, Status and Culture, 253

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Sets up the Kantian-vs-immediate aesthetic distinction that structures the argument.
  • XREF: Connects to Bourdieu’s cultural-capital arguments about educational capital correlating with taste. — connects to: Western elites long defined taste as the faculty of identifying beauty — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 241; Refining taste requires conscious learning beyond trusting one’s initial palate — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 251; Achieving high-status taste requires deep knowledge, congruence, and bounded originality — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 251 (+5 more)

Broader Connections