Task variation across studies explains inconsistent cognition-speech correlations

Evidence

Some of the inconsistencies in the relationship between SiN perception and cognition are most likely caused by varying combinations of speech perception and cognitive tasks. Like cognitive tasks, speech perception tasks can be conceptualised in different ways. Speech tasks may vary along several dimensions including the complexity of the target (e.g. phonemes vs. sentences), of the background signal (e.g. silence vs. steady-state noise vs. babble), and/or the overall difficulty (e.g. low vs. high signal-to-noise ratio) of the listening situation. It is difficult to know if and to what extent variations along these dimensions affect the relationship to cognition, and whether these variations may explain, at least in part, inconsistencies between studies. — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1230

Categorization

  • corroborated: 4 independent passages support this claim — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1230
  • XREF: connects to: Mixed findings about working memory and speech-in-noise stem from task-specific WM engagement; Processing-heavy working memory tasks correlate more strongly with noisy speech perception — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1230; Working-memory capacity predicts speech understanding only in linguistically complex listening tasks — Dijk, Pim van, Physiology, Psychoacoustics and…, 1156 (+1 more)

Broader Connections