System justification makes victims unwittingly complicit in their own disadvantage.
Evidence
A recently identiļ¬ed problem for prejudice victims stems from false consciousness ā the idea that one may hold a complex set of beliefs that are both false and contrary to oneās social interest. In general, these beliefs justify a system of inequality in which victims ļ¬nd themselves (see Jackman and Jost & Hamilton, chs. 6 and 13 this volume). The net result is that actions based on such beliefs further oneās disadvantaged position in society. System justiļ¬cation is characterized by psychological tendencies that include failure to perceive injustice and disadvantage, justiļ¬cation of social roles, false attribution of blame, identiļ¬cation with the oppressor, and resistance to change. System justiļ¬cation helps to explain negative self-stereotyping by disadvantaged group members and implicates an unwitting complicity of victims in their victimization. The inļ¬uence of social-structural dynamics (such as racial segregation or socio-economic status) is known to have an effect on cognitive processes, but with greater subtlety and nuance than was envisioned by Allport. ā , Rudman, Laurie A - On the Nature ofā¦, 1071
Categorization
- XREF: Directly connects to the vaultās prejudice-psychology claims; complements falsifiable contact-theory ground with the justification side of the picture.
- DEEPTHINKING: The claim that victims unwittingly collaborate in their own oppression ā via justifications that operate outside awareness and contrary to self-interest ā carries dense, durable conceptual weight that resists one-line summary.