Syrian naturalization hinged on courts linking the region to Judaism and Christianity

Evidence

Arabs like South Asians had a unique history of being classified or denied naturalization because the courts were unable to agree on whether they were white. In Ex parte Shahid (1913), Faras Shahid, a Syrian immigrant, was denied citizenship because common knowledge was used by the courts to argue he was not white because of his darker skin tone and his inability to speak English. George Dow, also a Syrian immigrant, was denied citizenship by several lower courts, but in United States v. Dow (1915), the courts ruled based on scientific evidence that he was white. This was based on the intelligence he displayed to the courts but also because the courts decided Syria was geographically associated with Judaism and Christianity, and therefore those from Syria could become citizens (Lopez 2006). — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 122

Categorization

  • QUESTION: The 1915 Dow ruling tied whiteness to geographic-religious association with Christianity — religion again operationalized as a formal legal criterion decades before the Muslim-threat frame. Reinforces the reader’s dating question about when religion first entered institutional categorization.
  • XREF: connects to: INS declared Arabs white by shared civilization, reversing court rulings to the contrary — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 123; INS formally classified Arabs as white via a nationwide instruction in 1943 — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 123; Syrian Christians accessed nominal whiteness but remained incompletely white — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 717 (+1 more)