Surveying ā€˜fair treatment’ cannot cleanly measure racial attitudes because whites can deem segregation fair.

Evidence

A final issue with this question unrelated to its consistency across time is that ā€œfair treatmentā€ is vague. If one believes that blacks are innately inferior or that the races should not mix, then limiting blacks to low-status jobs and segregated housing could be viewed as ā€œfair.ā€ Indeed, in 1958, the ANES specifically asks respondents to explain their views about school integration. Among those whose views were classified by ANES as ā€œanti-Negro,ā€ still only 32% percent disagreed that government should ensure ā€œfair treatmentā€ for blacks in the area of jobs and housing. This cross-tabulation suggests the notion of fairness in the jobs/housing question may be so vague as to be meaningless. — Ilyana Kuziemko and Ebonya Washington, Why Did the Democrats Lose the South?…, 1337

Categorization

  • QUESTION: This is direct methodological ammunition: if ā€˜fair treatment’ wording captures near-universal assent even among self-rated anti-Negro whites, then most racial-attitude survey items of the era likely suffer from wording-induced ceiling effects — worth chasing which other classic items share this flaw.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s threatened-privilege project: vague ā€˜fairness’ items let privileged respondents answer in ways that encode hierarchy-maintenance while reading as egalitarian — parallels the gap between stated fairness norms and revealed zero-sum behavior. — connects to: Social desirability bias does not currently invalidate survey measures of racial attitudes. — John F. Dovidio, Peter Glick, Laurie A. Rudman, On the Nature of Prejudice: Fifty Years…, 2200; Racism statistics may measure the collectors, not the facts — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 3138; Survey measures understate White racial prejudice due to social desirability
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Ilyana Kuziemko and Ebonya Washington, Why Did the Democrats Lose the South?…, 1337

Broader Connections