Structural factors, not ideology, gave women bridging roles

Evidence

The combination of men’s political repression, women’s relative freedom of movement, and the dominance of men in social movement organizations resulted in women’s central bridging role in the American civil rights movement and the South African anti‐apartheid movement (Kuumba, 2002). — Silke Roth, Intersectionality and coalitions in
, 159

Categorization

  • SHARE: Good structural-materialist explanation of why women became bridge leaders — specific and counterintuitive: it was men’s repression plus women’s mobility, not feminist solidarity.
  • XREF: connects to: Early women scientists acted through egalitarian religious sects and domestic-role constriction — Carolyn Merchant, The Death of Nature: Women, Ecology,
, 1017; Traditional women exercised political agency from behind the scenes — Frans Dokman, Beyond Bantu Philosophy_
, 961; Capitalist economic change, not feminism, drove women into the workforce — bell hooks, Ain’t I a Woman_ Black Women and
, 303 (+4 more)

Broader Connections