Stereotypes legitimize existing social hierarchy even against people’s own interests

Evidence

The opposite viewpoint is conceivable: Cultural stereotypes could instead reflect group-level sour grapes (with a bigot reasoning that the out-group may have high status, but they inherited it, lucked out, or cheated, so they do not deserve it, and they actually are stupid). However, we suggest that intergroup stereotypes turn in part on consciousness of power relations; stereotypes function to justify the status quo (Berger et al., 1980; Fiske, 1993a; Glick & Fiske, 2001b; Jost & Banaji, 1994; Jost, Burgess, & Mosso, 2001; Ridgeway & Berger, 1986). Envious stereotypes devolve on that high competence but low warmth lot who seem to be doing better than others. — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 43

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The system-justification framing flips the intuitive ‘contempt as sour grapes’ model: prejudice here enforces the hierarchy it reacts to, so the envied group’s success is coded as deserved even as they are resented. Dense enough to dwell on.
  • QUESTION: Fiske explicitly rebuts ‘sour grapes’ but also seems aware that bigot reasoning does happen. When does the entitlement rationalization win over correspondence bias in real stereotypes?
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Susan T. Fiske et al., A Model of (Often Mixed) Stereotype…, 43
  • XREF: connects to: Logical categories mirror social hierarchy and division of labor, not solidarity — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 43; System justification theory attributes stereotype endorsement to status-quo legitimization — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology: Key Readings, 140; Social role arrangement alone produces justifying stereotypes in both parties. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology: Key Readings, 2914 (+11 more)

Broader Connections