Status appraisal works by triangulating a whole package of signals against hard-to-fake cues

Evidence

Through our own temptations to cheat through symbols, we also recognize that everyone may be cheating through symbols. This makes us even more vigilant in status appraisals. The best method to detect fakery is triangulation—considering all signals, cues, and significant absences together. Triangulation forces us to look beyond single status symbols and toward the entire package of symbols. … In these cases, cues become particularly effective for revealing fakers, because they’re so hard to manipulate. Negative social shibboleths can overshadow even the best status symbol. — W. David Marx, Status and Culture, 236

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines triangulation as the appraisal method of reading all signals, cues, and significant absences together rather than single symbols.
  • XREF: Connects to the reader’s reading on social capital and reputation systems (Milgrom, opting out of legal systems) — both concern how trust/status is verified when direct knowledge fails. — connects to: Hard-to-fake cues reveal status more reliably than purchasable signals can — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 201; Status is communicated through manipulable observable characteristics rather than explicit claims — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 200; Signaling mastery lets pretenders convert faked status into real status — W. David Marx, Status and Culture: How Our Desire for…, 303 (+9 more)
  • CANDY: The Vuitton-bag shift from Paris-only acquisition to mass retail, and the working-class cabaret hostess detail, is a light concrete illustration of symbolism inflation.

Broader Connections