State secrecy conceals how watchlist names get selected

Evidence

The Muslim men I interviewed all shared the same experience of U.S. airports. Their Muslim names mark them as violent and dangerous to the state, and their bodies were consequently treated with scrutiny. The government maintains secrecy regarding the procedures for these lists, making it difficult to know how names are selected or why one actually appears on the lists. None of the Muslim American men interviewed exhibited travel behaviors that might raise suspicion of involvement in terrorism. They are ordinary American citizens who are routinely humiliated in airports on the basis of their Muslim identity. Muslim men are subjected to the Orientalist stereotype that they are incapable of loyalty to the United States (even when it is their country of origin), which strips them of the basic privileges associated with citizenship. The utilization of the Selectee List is one of the ways airports have become a racial terrain where some bodies are criminalized and scrutinized through hypersurveillance. — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 283

Categorization

  • XREF: The ‘racial terrain’ framing and Orientalist stereotype link directly to the ‘Inventing the Muslim Enemy’ thread — the state’s discretionary, secret list gives the Orientalist template its enforcement arm. — connects to: Secrecy about surveillance lists creates chronic uncertainty and vulnerability for Muslim citizens — , Selod, Saher - Forever Suspect_…, 276
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source