State power depends materially on the bodies citizens lend it.

Evidence

What Hobbes did, La BoĆ©tie had tried to undo, and by the same means. After all, the master who oppresses you and ā€œfor whom you go bravely to war, for whose greatness you do not refuse to offer your own bodies unto death … where has he acquired enough eyes to spy upon you, if you do not provide them yourselves? How can he have so many arms to beat you with, if he does not borrow them from you?ā€ Therein lay the fundamental material contradiction: if power is embodied solely by our bodies, we can always refuse to offer them. — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 695 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Arendt explained that, owing to this fundamental corporeal dependence, the power of the state—even in the most authoritarian of regimes—must, despite everything, be power and not pure violence. There is no power without bodies. But, as she in a way acknowledged, the reciprocal statement is true: with no bodies mobilized, there is no longer any power. — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 697 (#corroborates, via linked claim)

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: State dependence on soldiers’ bodies secured social bargaining power; Substituting capital for soldiers gives the state social autonomy; State power depends on borrowing the bodies of its subjects — Grégoire Chamayou, A Theory of the Drone, 695 (+14 more)

Broader Connections