Speculative reading demands the self lose form then recover it

Evidence

Only a reader who is already ā€˜formed’ could recognize the cancellation of form and ā€˜inform’ this very cancellation. In the first stage, the reader definitely lets go every and all form, like the wax one has been modelling: the reader loses the form of the ā€˜knowing I’, which had represented the self ā€˜relating to the content as to an accident or a predicate’. At the same time the reader, as a ā€˜particular Self’, disappears. But this ordeal, in which the ā€˜Self’ ā€˜sinks’ into the content, is only the first phase of the speculative fall. Plasticity is not polymorphism. In the second stage, the reader must recover from (se relever de) this decline so that the efficacy of its advent can be manifest, in the assumption of the meaning of the proposition. — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel, 1224

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Defines plasticity against polymorphism: plasticity requires a second phase of recovery, not mere dissolution of form — the core definitional move distinguishing Hegel’s concept.
  • XREF: Directly the theoretical root of the reader’s brain/plasticity work — this two-stage structure (form-loss then recovery) maps onto what the reader draws from plasticity conceptually. — connects to: The reader’s insistence on remaining himself blocks genuine reading — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1234; Reading a speculation means joining the proposition’s backward movement toward its origin — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1216; Reading a speculative proposition requires transforming meaning through interpretation — Catherine Malabou, The Future of Hegel: Plasticity,…, 1225 (+4 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: The ā€˜wax one has been modelling’ image and the staging of a fall followed by recovery is a dense, paradigm-level articulation of the plasticity schema — top-tier.

Broader Connections