Specific claims are subordinate to a superordinate conspiracy narrative

Evidence

A consequence of this type of reasoning is that the specifics of the conspiracy don’t matter; as long as the explanation is sufficiently conspiratorial in nature, it still provides a sense of global, higher order ‘coherence’. Remember, the point is that some evil group is plotting something somewhere. As long as there’s potential for a superordinate conspiracy, then espousing contradictory beliefs is still consistent with the underlying worldview, even when lower-order explanations don’t always add up. That’s why Neil deGrasse Tyson was fighting an uphill battle: any inconsistencies in B.o.B’s beliefs were justified by larger suspicions that NASA was hiding the truth. There is no psychological cure (that I know of) that unravels or counteracts the fully developed conspiratorial worldview. And it’s highly contagious. — Sander van der Linden, Foolproof, 195

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The observation that global ‘coherence’ overrides local contradiction — the worldview tolerates any inconsistency as long as a larger plot accounts for it — is a genuinely paradigm-level insight into why such systems are immutable.
  • XREF: connects to: Belief in some conspiracies predicts endorsement of unrelated fictional ones — Sander van der Linden, Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects…, 184; Conspiracy theories primarily assign blame rather than explain events — Anna Merlan, Republic of Lies, 972; Assessing conspiracist claims requires dual suspension of disbelief and suspicion — Russell Muirhead and Nancy L. Rosenblum, A Lot of People Are Saying: The New…, 40 (+18 more)

Broader Connections