Southern congressmen framed southern European immigrants as racially impure

Evidence

Neither Gompers nor Lodge realized that another section was taking their cause just as much or more to heart. The South as well as the Far West was stirring with nativist ferment. In fact, two southerners seized the initiative in Congress. An Alabaman, Oscar W. Underwood, was the first to raise the immigration question when the legislators convened in December 1905. Breaking irrelevantly into another debate, Underwood instructed the House on the pure whiteness of the old immigration in contrast to the mixture of Asiatic and African blood coursing in the veins of southern Europeans. — John Higham, Strangers in the Land, 984

Categorization

  • ADDENDUM: Confirms for the reader the racialization of the ‘enemy’ category (white-Anglo vs. ‘mixed Asiatic/African blood’ southern Europeans) occurring within the nativist frame rather than replacing it.
  • XREF: connects to: Southern congressmen racialized southern Europeans by analogy to miscegenation with Blacks. — John Higham, Strangers in the Land: Patterns of…, 2304; Southern European immigrants were lynched for being racialized as Black — Sahar F. Aziz, The Racial Muslim: When Racism Quashes…, 392; Southern and eastern European immigrants were racialized before entering whiteness after WWII — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 227 (+8 more)

Broader Connections