South African racial categories shifted with expediency despite extreme racism

Evidence

Note one telling feature of South Africa’s racial categories. Although few large states have ever adopted as explicitly and oppressively racist policies as South Africa, no consistent and durable set of beliefs drove the South African racial system. Racial distinctions enforced by the state shifted repeatedly over time. Although the African/European line stayed in more or less the same place, other divisions altered as a function of political expediency, practical feasibility, and struggle among the parties. Organizational convenience overrode and transformed prevailing beliefs. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 564

Categorization

  • QUESTION: If even apartheid’s racial lines were manufactured by organizational need rather than durable belief, what does that imply for the regime-capacity matrix’s treatment of categorization as a capacity tool?
  • XREF: Echoes Annihilation of Caste material on census classification hardening hierarchies, and Along the Archival Grain on colonial taxonomy as unruly fabrication. — connects to: Apartheid’s racial stigma drove the shift from ‘Bantu’ to ‘Ubuntu’ discourse; South African whites were themselves once labeled as separate races — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 655; Apartheid intensified preexisting state-created categories rather than inventing new ones — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 566 (+6 more)
  • DEEPTHINKING: This inverts the common reading of apartheid as pure ideology: categories followed bureaucratic and political need, belief was downstream. A dense claim about how categorization functions within high-capacity repressive regimes.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 564

Broader Connections