Social media performers systematically conceal the labor behind curated feminine glamour

Evidence

Jessie’s mention of the “Instagram filter” is a reference to the culture of vigilant self-monitoring on social media, particularly as individuals internalize directives to brand the self with resolve: we un-tag unflattering photos, we build credibility through “friend” and “follower” counts, and we harness our online personae to pithy self-descriptors that function as digital sound bites. For fashion bloggers, beauty vloggers, and other denizens of the feminine digital media economy, these activities are amplified; however, the work of such personal branding endeavors gets concealed behind a torrent of images and textual referents that ostensibly mask the labor required to earn a living doing what you love. — Brooke Erin Duffy, (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love, 500

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Chapter 5’s claim that calculated authenticity emerged as promotion in early twentieth-century America. — connects to: Emotional labor requires inducing or suppressing feeling for others’ sake — Brooke Erin Duffy, (Not) Getting Paid to Do What You Love:…, 70; Influencers present divergent glamorized and grim self-images across platforms — Grant Bollmer, Katherine Guinness, The Influencer Factory: A Marxist…, 204; Feminine presentation is coerced self-objectification in disguise — Simone de Beauvoir, The Second Sex, 900 (+3 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines the chapter’s titular ‘Instagram filter’ concept.

Broader Connections