So-called postmodern trends merely continue capitalist processes begun under modernism

Evidence

These developments - the recuperation of the avant garde for art, the incorporation and commodification of Modernism, the false sublation of art and life - seem much more important than any of the changes associated with the supposed emergence of a distinctively Postmodern art. Bürger lists the following trends, all of which have been claimed as exemplars of the Postmodern: ‘a positive stance towards the architecture of the fin-de-siècle and hence an essentially more critical judgement of modern architecture; the softening of the rigid dichotomy between higher and lower art, which Adorno still considered to be irreconcilably opposed; a revaluation of the figura­ tive paintings of the 1920s… ; a return to the traditional novel even by representatives of the experimental novel.’ — Alex Callinicos, Against Postmodernism, 574

Categorization

  • XREF: The core methodological move of the whole book — reframing each alleged ‘postmodern’ trait as continuous with modernism and capital. Direct counterargument to Jameson. — connects to: Postmodernism is a tendency within late modernism, not its successor — Aijaz Ahmad, In Theory: Nations, Classes, Literatures, 236; Postmodernism cannot be understood apart from late capitalism’s economic structure — Fredric Jameson, Postmodernism, or, The Cultural Logic…, 374; Certain modernist precursors already contained what became postmodern (+8 more)

Broader Connections