Situational deference to authority, not coercion, drives obedience to mass-murder regimes

Evidence

Milgram’s experiments reconceptualized a crucial issue by shifting the focus away from coerced obedience to noncoerced, situationally induced deference to author­ ity. (In this regard it should be noted that Milgram included the state’s power to legitimize and disseminate ideology as a factor that helped to define the “situation.”) And the fact that his subjects were both randomly selected and non-German lent his conclusions undeniably universalistic implications. — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide, 46

Categorization

  • XREF: The situational account of perpetrator behavior parallels Glick’s situational account of scapegoating — envied outgroups trigger targeting through circumstance, not perpetrator disposition. — connects to: Inferiority alone cannot justify genocide; danger claims are required — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide: The Social…, 2160; Ordinary people become destructive agents through duty, not hostility — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide: The Social…, 606; Ordinary, unselected Germans carried out mass killing when asked — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide: The Social…, 315 (+10 more)
  • recurring: this claim recurs 2 times within its source

Broader Connections