Milgram reframed perpetrator compliance as situational deference, not coerced obedience

Evidence

In the face of the constant claims made by perpetrators on trial that they had been forced to obey orders, Milgram’s experiments reconceptualized a crucial issue by shifting the focus away from coerced obedience to noncoerced, situationally induced deference to author­ ity. (In this regard it should be noted that Milgram included the state’s power to legitimize and disseminate ideology as a factor that helped to define the “situation.”) And the fact that his subjects were both randomly selected and non-German lent his conclusions undeniably universalistic implications. — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide, 46

Categorization

  • DEFINE: Spells out the crucial conceptual move: noncoerced, situationally induced deference replaces coerced obedience as the explanatory mechanism.
  • XREF: connects to: Situational deference to authority, not coercion, drives obedience to mass-murder regimes — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide: The Social…, 46; Milgram’s obedience findings displaced motivational and personality explanations of genocide — Leonard S. Newman and Ralph Erber (eds.), Understanding Genocide: The Social…, 736; Authoritarian traits meaningfully shape behavior despite situational influences — Bob Altemeyer, The Authoritarian Specter, 591 (+4 more)

Broader Connections