Sinhalese claims to primordial ownership rest on the Mahavamsa’s mytho-history.

Evidence

Both the Sinhalese and Tamils resort to mytho-history to legitimize “sons of the soil” status, with the Sinhalese claiming their ancestors were the first to arrive on the island from North India. Sinhalese derive this certainty from the Mahavamsa (Great Chronicle), first written around the sixth century CE and updated during the thirteenth, fourteenth, and eighteenth centuries to explain Buddhism’s ascendance and preeminence in Sri Lanka. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology, 64

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects directly to the reader’s research on manufactured external-enemy ideology: the Mahavamsa functions as a constructed provenance myth, paralleling sons-of-the-soil narratives in other ethno-nationalist settings like Israel’s Exodus narrative or Indian Hindu nationalism. — connects to: Sinhalese nationalist claims rest on chronicle authority and a myth of paternalistic tolerance. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 187; The Mahavamsa is constructed myth that elites elevate to indisputable history — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 71; Sinhalese-Tamil enmity is legitimized by myth rather than primordial fact — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 78 (+2 more)
  • DEFINE: Defines mytho-history as a legitimacy device and pinpoints the Mahavamsa as its source document.
  • ADDENDUM: Supports any of the three articles’ concern with how origin narratives anchor group solidarity — here a state-building origin myth rather than sacrifice or dress.

Broader Connections