Sinhalaness was consolidated around language, not religion.

Evidence

The very first riot in modern Sri Lankan history was not between Sinhalese and Tamils but between Buddhists and Catholics. The so-called Kotahena riot of 1883 was quickly put down by the British authorities, but it highlighted the growing religious divide between the two communities, especially at a time when Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism was on the upswing. This burgeoning Sinhalese Buddhist nationalism, however, was subsumed by Sinhala linguistic nationalism, which enabled all Sinhalese, irrespective of their religious beliefs, to mobilize to make their language the island’s sole national language. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist Ideology, 241

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly feeds the reader’s core question about manufactured vs primordial identity — here the salient in-group boundary shifted from religion to language, showing identity categories as constructed and fluid. Connects to the Herderian-homogeneity line in We and the ‘enemy must be manufactured’ pattern examined across the reader’s threat-solidarity bibliography. — connects to: Shared language and culture do not constitute belonging to a nation.; Language loyalty overrides religious division to unify Sinhalese against Tamils. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 241; The Sinhala language conflates race, nation, and people, blocking a multiethnic state idea. — Neil DeVotta, Sinhalese Buddhist Nationalist…, 190 (+2 more)
  • SEED: Angle: how linguistic nationalism temporarily ‘solved’ the Buddhist-Christian schism — an intra-Sinhalese manufactured unity whose fragility re-emerged once the shared linguistic enemy vanished, mirroring the reader’s threat-decay question at a finer grain.
  • SHARE: For someone studying Sri Lanka or ethnic boundary formation: the first modern Sri Lankan riot was Buddhist vs Catholic in 1883, not Sinhalese vs Tamil.

Broader Connections