Serfdom’s abolition split the peasant’s fused roles into pure owners and pure laborers

Evidence

As he existed in Prussia until about 1810, the enserfed peasant found himself in a peculiar intermediate position regarding both his lord and his land. The land belonged to the lord, to be sure, but not in such a way that the peasant himself could have no right at all to it. Likewise, the peasant was of course bound to work the lord’s fields for him, but close by he also worked the land that had been allotted to him for his own benefit. With the abolition of serfdom, a certain part of the land that the peasant had formerly owned in a limited sense was converted into true, free property. The lord was left to seek wage laborers, whom he recruited for the most part from among the owners of smaller parcels that he had purchased. Thus, whereas the peasant had had within himself the partial attributes of owner and of laborer for another’s benefit, a sharp differentiation of these attributes followed the abolition of serfdom: one part became pure owner, the other part pure laborer. — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 601

Categorization

• XREF: connects to: Abolition of slavery coincided with capitalism’s reorganization toward new labor forms — Cedric J. Robinson, Black Marxism_ The Making of the Black…, 1434; The English Enclosure Acts forced peasants off commons land into factory labor. — Rebecca A. Martusewicz, Jeff Edmundson, and John Lupinacci, EcoJustice Education: Toward Diverse,…, 1365

Related

• Scholarly distinctions between serfdom and slavery were blurred in practice (similarity 0.78)

Broader Connections

• Abolition of slavery coincided with capitalism’s reorganization toward new labor forms #corroborates (0.55) — Cedric J. Robinson, Black Marxism_ The Making of the Black…, 1434