Science’s self-correcting attitude is a model for resisting post-truth.

Evidence

There is no such thing as liberal science or conservative science. When we are asking an empirical question, what should count most is the evidence. As Senator Daniel Patrick Moynihan said long ago (on another topic): “You are entitled to your own opinion, but not your own facts.” The strength of science is that it embraces an attitude of constantly checking one’s beliefs against the empirical evidence, and changing those beliefs as one learns what the facts are. Can we vow to bring a little bit of this attitude to our consideration of other factual matters? If not, I’m afraid there is an even greater danger out there than post-truth. — Lee McIntyre, Post-Truth, 332

Categorization

  • XREF: connects to: Scientists actively seek to overthrow their own provisional beliefs; Fighting post-truth requires doubting one’s own favored beliefs first — Lee McIntyre, Post-Truth, 330; Psychological inoculation can build societal resistance to misinformation — Sander van der Linden, Foolproof: Why Misinformation Infects…, 20 (+8 more)

Broader Connections