Schooling can breed workers unwilling to accept workplace subordination
Evidence
Students are rewarded for exhibiting discipline, subordinacy, intellectually as opposed to emotionally oriented behavior, and hard work independent from intrinsic task motivation. Moreover, these traits are rewarded independently of any effect of “proper demeanor” on scholastic achievement. — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America, 505 (
#corroborates, via linked claim)
Categorization
- XREF: connects to: Capitalism, not technology, limits what schools can reform. — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America:…, 289; Differentiated schooling reproduces rather than abolishes class divisions; Disciplinary schooling values the act of keeping position more than the position itself (+5 more)
Related
- Schools reward discipline and subordinacy regardless of their effect on achievement (similarity 0.86)
- Education can nurture workers unwilling to accept workplace domination (similarity 0.86)
- Schools replicate workplace dominance hierarchies to produce a docile labor force. (similarity 0.86)
- Public schooling in America was founded to produce a properly subordinate adult population (similarity 0.82)
- Workers concede innate differences justify their lower occupational position (similarity 0.80)
- Schools both reproduce inequality and generate resistance to it (similarity 0.80)
- Education simultaneously raises worker productivity and defuses class conflict to preserve profits (similarity 0.79)
Broader Connections
- Schools reward discipline and subordinacy regardless of their effect on achievement
#corroborates(0.90) — Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis, Schooling in Capitalist America, 505 - Differentiated schooling reproduces rather than abolishes class divisions
#expands(0.82) - Disciplinary schooling values the act of keeping position more than the position itself
#corroborates(0.78) - Workers concede innate differences justify their lower occupational position
#complicates(0.75) — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 2200