Said’s static-views claim nullifies Orientalism’s own historical impact

Evidence

At one point in Orientalism, Said argues that there was no essential difference between twelfth-and thirteenth-century views of Islam on the one hand and those held in the twentieth century on the other hand. From this, one would have to deduce that the invention and development of Orientalism from the eighteenth century onwards has had no impact whatsoever, for good or ill, on the way Europeans have thought and felt about Islam in modern times. — Robert Irwin, For Lust of Knowing, 514

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The logical self-destruction — asserting timeless sameness makes the book’s own object of study powerless — deserves extended reflection.
  • SEED: An essay angle: how a polemic can undercut its own core premise through internal contradiction.
  • XREF: connects to: Orientalism depicts MENA people as static and essentially religious despite modernity — Deepa Kumar, Islamophobia and the Politics of…, 101