Revolutions happen when obstacles to pressure are removed, not when they are created.
Evidence
Revolutions thus occur when obstacles to strong pressures are unblocked; they are not, as typical contingency theorists believe, the very result of blockage. Hence the assertion in our explanation-sketches: for inherency theory, the pivotal problem is what prevents extreme conflict from taking place; in contingency theory, the issue is what causes it at all. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology, 4306
Categorization
- DEFINE: Clean statement of the inherency vs. contingency theory split: inherency asks what blocks inevitable conflict; contingency asks what triggers it.
- XREF: connects to: Revolution happens when state barriers to pressure are removed, not blocked. — John T. Jost and Jim Sidanius, Political Psychology: Key Readings, 4306; Contention is not a hydraulic response to pressure but shaped by prior institutions — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 631; The experimental time freed from rent pressure, not entrepreneurial time, produces the new — Mark Fisher (edited by Darren Ambrose), K-Punk: The Collected and Unpublished…, 1638