Restoring a cultural element without adopting its fundamentalist politics requires fully self-conscious intervention
Evidence
The liberation of Muslim-majority Bangladesh from Pakistan in 1971 was officially on linguistic-cultural rather than religious grounds. My friend the poet has this question: How do we restore the Islamic elements in Bengali without identifying with a program of religious fundamentalism? Bengali is my mother tongue too. So there we were: he born a Muslim, I born a Hindu, he Bangladeshi, I Indian, neither of us very religious, totally against fundamentalism, and neither of us at all interested in the crazy project of a separatist Bengal, a pipedream that is occasionally brought out for sentimental or political rhetoric. I said to him that I thought that since language cannot be interfered with self-consciously, the only way to do it is absolutely self-consciously; that is to say, write manifestos, and so on. I have a great deal of sympathy with self-conscious tampering, because one knows that language works behind and beyond and beside self-consciousness. — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader, 188
Categorization
- XREF: This is Spivak’s practical answer to the strategic-essentialism bind in concrete form: recover an identity-term strategically while writing manifestos to keep the self-conscious frame from collapsing into belief. — connects to: Treating subject-restoration strategically would arm the group against Western anti-humanism’s blind spots — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of…, 1780; Liberation requires retaining critical judgment and cultural heritage; Studying other cultures without repression requires rethinking knowledge and power — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 93 (+7 more)
- QUESTION: Her claim that ‘language cannot be interfered with self-consciously, the only way is absolutely self-consciously’ is paradoxical — does the manifesto actually prevent collapse into genuine essentialism, or only for its authors?
Broader Connections
- Liberation requires retaining critical judgment and cultural heritage
#expands(0.82) - Cultural criticism must model the structure-agency dialogue rather than impose ideology from above
#expands(0.82) — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 384 - Critical multiculturalism requires self-critique of one’s own culture first
#expands(0.80) — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 952 - Enlightenment must critique itself rather than merely defend cultural values
#expands(0.80) — Theodor W. Adorno, Max Horkheimer, Dialectic of Enlightenment, 24 - Knowing another culture needs uncoercive contact and interpretive self-consciousness
#expands(0.78) — Edward W. Said, Covering Islam, 328 - Estrangement from one’s own culture enables genuine judgment of it and others
#expands(0.78) - Studying other cultures without repression requires rethinking knowledge and power
#qualifies(0.75) — Edward W. Said, Orientalism, 93 - Authentic revolution must be a cultural revolution because culture preserves oppressive structures
#corroborates(0.72) — Paulo Freire, Pedagogy of the Oppressed, 582