Cultural criticism must model the structure-agency dialogue rather than impose ideology from above

Evidence

No longer is it sufficient to read onto popular culture the ideological tendencies and tropes of capitalism, patriarchy, heteronormativity and other systems of power (though this work remains critically important). Nor is it sufficient to feign surprise when the researcher “finds” agency, creativity and “resistance” where, allegedly, none was expected. Rather, we must look to the extremely complicated ways popular culture shapes the dialogic relationship between structure and agency, between value and imagination, towards the perpetuation of durable systems of exploitation and inequality in financialized times. — Max Haiven, Cultures of Financialization, 384

Categorization

  • XREF: Direct methodological bridge to deWaard’s argument about finance colonizing culture; also echoes Stuart Hall’s articulation theory. — connects to: Effective criticism shapes culture rather than merely describing it — David Theo Goldberg, John Solomos, A Companion to Racial and Ethnic Studies, 2688; Authentic cultural criticism requires simultaneous participation and detachment — Theodor W. Adorno, The Culture Industry: Selected Essays…, 55; Restoring a cultural element without adopting its fundamentalist politics requires fully self-conscious intervention — Donna Landry and Gerald MacLean, The Spivak Reader: Selected Works of…, 188
  • SEED: Could be the methodological manifesto section for an essay on how pop-culture commodities (Pokémon, trading cards) teach financial abstraction to children.

Broader Connections