Resilience forms a subject between biology and social context

Evidence

Resilience thus appears as “both a synchronic and a diachronic process” that brings “developmental biological forces into articulation with the social context in order to create a self-representation that makes possible the historicization of the subject.”^1 Or further: resilience “should not only be sought inside the person, nor within his environment, but between the two, because it ceaselessly weaves processes of intimate becoming into processes of social becoming.” — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded, 3798

Categorization

• DEFINE: Cyrulnik’s resilience is a between-domain process that historicizes the subject.
• XREF: connects to: Biology represents what social engineering cannot yet alter — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 186; The situation resembles an evolutionary environment structuring adaptation — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre: The Riddle of…, 444; Social-environmental supports sustain behavior change that motivation alone cannot (+6 more)

Broader Connections

• Social-environmental supports sustain behavior change that motivation alone cannot #exemplifies (0.80)
• Resilience marks irreversible psychic change, not a return to prior equilibrium #expands (0.80) — Catherine Malabou, The New Wounded, 3800
• Biological aggression mechanisms are presided over by cognitive and social influences #qualifies (0.80) — Albert Bandura, Moral Disengagement, 159
• The situation resembles an evolutionary environment structuring adaptation #expands (0.78) — Christine Daigle, Jacob Golomb (eds.), Beauvoir and Sartre, 444
• Resilience means forming oneself out of the annihilation of form #expands (0.78) — Catherine Malabou, What Should We Do with Our Brain?, 251
• Biology represents what social engineering cannot yet alter #qualifies (0.75) — Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 186
• Irreconcilable conflict gives society its texture, durability, and resilience #expands (0.75) — Georg Simmel, on individuality and social forms_…, 93