Biology represents what social engineering cannot yet alter
Evidence
One could indeed point out that β in our age of artificiality of the social order, of the putative omnipotence of education and, more generally, of social engineering β biology in general, and heredity in particular, stand in public consciousness for the area still off-limits for cultural manipulation; something we do not know yet how to tinker with and to mould and reshape according to our will. β Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 186
Categorization
- XREF: Connects to biopolitics/necropolitics in the readerβs theory toolkit: defining a group biologically places them beyond social redemption, a mechanism Islamophobia readings can reuse. β connects to: The boundary between biological and cultural evolution is dissolving β Emlen, Douglas J, Animal Weapons_ The Evolution of Battle, 493; Socialization manipulates but never produces moral capacity β Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 498; Biopolitics governs populations through statistics, not individuals β Michel Foucault, Society Must Be Defended, 261 (+3 more)
Related
- Socialization manipulates but never produces moral capacity (similarity 0.81)
- Biopolitics governs populations through statistics, not individuals (similarity 0.79)
- The boundary between biological and cultural evolution is dissolving (similarity 0.79)
- Nazi social policy extended breeding logic to urban improvement and elimination. (similarity 0.79)
Broader Connections
- Socialization manipulates but never produces moral capacity
#corroborates(0.85) β Zygmunt Bauman, Modernity and the Holocaust, 498 - The boundary between biological and cultural evolution is dissolving
#complicates(0.82) β Emlen, Douglas J, Animal Weapons_ The Evolution of Battle, 493