Republican ideals could be advanced by studying real-world successful collective action

Evidence

Civic republicanism does not constitute a panacea to the dangers that await modern democracies; however, its preoccupation with norms, generating trust and institutional stability could go a long way towards reducing these risks. I set out to identify here new ways in which future republican experiments could realize their ideals. I argued that one way of doing that would be by starting from real-world examples in which collective action succeeds, and which were studied in the institutional analysis and development framework. A future research agenda could analyze the extent to which non-domination is promoted within already functioning polycentric systems. — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic, 83

Categorization

  • XREF: Connects to Elinor Ostrom’s IAD framework and polycentric governance, plus Levitsky and Ziblatt’s ‘How Democracies Die’ norms argument. — connects to: Well-designed republican institutions can generate norms of policy-making through games of acceptability. — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic: Social…, 19; Effective political action requires concert, confidence, and common bonds — Hannah Arendt, The Origins of Totalitarianism, 2467; Effective political action requires common opinions, affections, and interests (+2 more)
  • SEED: Could seed an essay bridging civic republican theory with Ostrom’s commons governance empirical findings.
  • corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Adelin-Costin Dumitru, Forging the Resistive Republic: Social…, 83

Broader Connections