Regime-specific histories shape the repertoires available to social movements.

Evidence

The shaping of social movements by regimes operates both across regimes and within regimes. Across regimes, previous histories lay down different webs of issues, performances, symbols, and political alignments that significantly affect the conduct of social movements. As we have seen, some contemporary Indian social movements proceed with an array of chariots, religious symbols, and rituals that seem exotic to Western eyes. With equal clarity, Evian’s Intergalactic Village, Greens, and ATTAC mark the 2003 mobilization as belonging to the twenty-first-century Western European world of social movements. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1172

Categorization

• corroborated: 2 independent passages support this claim — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1172
• XREF: connects to: A regime’s prior trajectory shapes its present repertoires — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 683; Regime and repertoire organization shapes which revolutionary shifts occur. — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 995; High-capacity semi-democratic regimes generated the social-movement repertoire that channeled revolutionary contention — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1071 (+7 more)

Broader Connections

• Regime change drives repertoire change more than popular consciousness does #corroborates (0.88)
• Repertoire change intertwines regime transformation, internal struggle history, and broader social change #corroborates (0.82) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 287
• Regime-internal shifts, not challenger agency or external pressure, initiate repertoire change #expands (0.78) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 657
• Social-movement activity depends on regime-backed rights to endure retaliation #qualifies (0.74) — Charles Tilly, Regimes and Repertoires, 1178