Racism, not migrancy, should frame European postcolonial settlement history

Evidence

I prefer to say that if there has to be one single concept, a solitary unifying idea around which the history of postcolonial settlement in twentieth-century Europe should revolve, that place of glory should be given not to migrancy but to racism. The racisms of Europe’s colonial and imperial phase preceded the appearance of migrants inside the European citadel. It was racism and not diversity that made their arrival into a problem. — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 29

Categorization

  • XREF: Directly reverses the premise familiar from diversity/multiculturalism scholarship elsewhere in the book; also resonates with the ‘complaints… go way back’ theme that racialisation precedes arrival. — connects to: Racism is a structural feature of European civilization, not the exception of colonial adventurers — Frantz Fanon, Constance Farrington, Black skin, white masks, 338; European historicism made racial difference explain subordination instead of colonial power. — Nick Couldry & Ulises A. Mejias, The Costs of Connection: How Data Is…, 263; Racial attitudes were forged in Europe’s internal debates before Cape settlement — David Theo Goldberg, The Threat of Race: Reflections on…, 1316 (+5 more)
  • CANDY: The reversal ‘racism and not diversity made their arrival into a problem’ is a punchy, tweetable formulation.
  • corroborated: 4 independent passages support this claim — Luke de Noronha, The conviviality of the overpoliced,…, 29

Broader Connections