Public speaking contexts actively shrink citizens’ circles of concern

Evidence

The puzzle in both of these cases is that citizens’ circles of concern shrank when they spoke in public contexts. In both cases, broad political concerns surfaced and then mysteriously vanished behind very personal-sounding concerns: ”my house,” ”my children,” ”close to home.” People implicitly know that some face-to-face contexts invite public-spirited debate and conversation, and others do not; in contemporary US society, most do not. Examining where and how citizens can comfortably talk about politics might help us understand how so many Americans manage to make the realm of politics seem irrelevant to so many everyday enterprises. — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics, 93

Categorization

  • SEED: The claim that public forums force private, personal framings — that speaking publicly narrows rather than broadens concern — is a counterintuitive seed for an essay on why ‘going public’ fails to build solidarity.
  • XREF: Links to the reader’s broader civic-life question: how solidarity is (or is not) built in face-to-face contexts; connects to World of Strangers on which contexts invite what kind of talk. — connects to: Public forums shrink citizens’ circles of concern toward personal interests. — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics: how Americans
, 93; Citizens express narrower ideas as their audience grows wider — Nina Eliasoph, “Close to home”: The work of avoiding
, 32; Activists suppress their systemic political analyses when speaking publicly. — Nina Eliasoph, Avoiding politics: how Americans
, 88 (+3 more)

Broader Connections