Public execution reactivates injured sovereign power rather than restoring justice.

Evidence

The public execution, then, has a juridico-political function. It is a ceremonial by which a momentarily injured sovereignty is reconstituted. It restores that sovereignty by manifesting it at its most spectacular. … Its aim is not so much to re-establish a balance as to bring into play, as its extreme point, the dissymmetry between the subject who has dared to violate the law and the all-powerful sovereign who displays his strength. … The public execution did not re-establish justice; it reactivated power. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 104

Categorization

  • DEEPTHINKING: The claim that punishment aims at imbalance and excess rather than proportionality is a dense, paradigm-shifting inversion of what punitive ritual is for.
  • XREF: The ritual that ‘reactivates power’ maps onto how Oceania’s public spectacles and executions reconsolidate Party authority. — connects to: Public execution functions as a political ritual of power, not mere justice. — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 101; Public punishment served to reconstitute the sovereign’s injured authority — Khaled Fahmy, All the Pasha_s Men_ Mehmed Ali, his…, 675; Rather than displaying sovereign power, executions staged a reversible duel between executioner and people — Michel Foucault, Discipline & Punish- The Birth of the…, 119 (+7 more)

Broader Connections